Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evarose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evarose[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROD was removed. Could not establish WP:NBAND or WP:GNG; also unref article on living people. Boleyn (talk) 09:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 00:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Probably too soon for this band. There's a bit of light coverage by local sources, but I'm not seeing anything that would qualify as significant. Once they become a bit more notable, the article can be recreated. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.