Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelical Catholic Church (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-27 09:32Z

Evangelical Catholic Church[edit]

Delete non notable and no verifiable sources other than an AOL homepage. Адам Райли ^Talk 20:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletions. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 20:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is not a simple church building. It is clear from the article that it is a religious denomination. I suspect the fact it is incorporated in Arizona (as stated in the article) means the societies and charities register of Arizona would have a record of this intitution's existence. Agent 86 21:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable because it's a denomination. (Small and eccentric, yes. But a denom nontheless.) -- Bpmullins | Talk 21:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep but... there need to be independent sources cited! I could have made the aol page, and written this article, entirely myself. Charlie 22:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this is a denomination, not a local congregation. Pastordavid 23:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Catholicism... there does not seem to be evidence of its notability as a subgroup.--Buridan 04:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Here is the first AFD.
Keep because it is a denomination and because of the sources that Uncle G found in the first AFD. GRBerry 04:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per PastorDavid.. This is a denomination.Edison 04:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Small, but notability established by 3rd party interest. This should not be redirected to either Catholicism or Lutheranism. Gimmetrow 02:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.