Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Lazzaro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 02:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Eva Lazzaro[edit]
- Eva Lazzaro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable per WP:ENT. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This young actress seems to be building a resume quickly and the page will just get bigger and more notable as she gets older. Consider it a stub. laurap414 (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC) (I don't really know the proper way to vote so sorry about that)[reply]
- Keep meets the multiple significant roles requirement of ENT (Blessed, Tangle-especially with the Logie nomination), and as a basic news search shows, she had sufficient significant coverage for both her acting and now directing a Tropfest short film too, to satisfy WP:GNG. The-Pope (talk) 13:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Logie nominee. Main subject of articles in The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald (refs 1 and 5 in expanded article (at time of writing)). duffbeerforme (talk) 10:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is a young up and coming actress. I believe Non-notable is not an argument in this case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deangunn (talk • contribs) 19:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.