Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Bonda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 18:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Bonda[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neuroscientist. Only published a few articles between 1995-1996 JenShapiro (talk) 09:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. JenShapiro (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. JenShapiro (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JenShapiro (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. JenShapiro (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not pass the notability requirments for an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 4 papers with high cites in GS but that's all. spa creator confuses Wikipedia with LinkedIn. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Some highly cited papers, as Xxan notes, but not the depth of citation I would expect to see for a pass of WP:PROF#C1 in this highly-cited area. No evidence of passing other WP:PROF criteria. Article reads more like a promotion of the subject's clinical practice than like the biography of a researcher. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:39, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.