Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Bella

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No point in wasting time (non-admin closure) Akhiljaxxn (talk) 07:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Bella[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON? Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm asking for a keep, mostly due the fact she seems to have more experience as a child than do most of the Bollywood actor articles you see popping up. There is some coverage. I think WP:THREE is good enough at the moment. scope_creep^Talk 10:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep an actress (voice or other) is known for their work, and this one has had significant roles. We have enough coverage to show notability Like this non trivial coverage in The Omaha Herald. Lightburst (talk) 15:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the Omaha coverage and non-trivial roles in (the English versions of) the extremely notable Frozen franchise, amongst several other significant acting credits like Shimmer and Shine. — Bilorv (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bilorv, well i think her role in Frozen isn't that significant since she played young Anna, not old Anna, which is played by Kristen Bell. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 08:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
She played young Elsa, not young Anna. It's not a main role, no, but it's a significant acting credit in the context of being one of the most popular films in history. Combined with her other significant roles, such as a main role in the series Shimmer and Shine, this gives her notability. — Bilorv (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as passes WP:NACTOR criteria 1 with prominent roles in notable productions such as Shimmer and Shine tv series top billing and film roles with coverage such as omaha.com, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this might be the first time I've !voted such a way at AfD, since child actors and voice actors are so rarely notable and appeals to think of the children annoy me so very much. However, Frozen is no ordinary film; it's the biggest franchise for the little set. Even smaller parts create notability, since children will demand their baby sitter/child minder to watch this insipid tale for the 34th time, please, please, please, Colleen! Bearian (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find it strange that no one went for a Frozen reference and called for a Snowball Keep. Capt. Milokan (talk) 02:09, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.