Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurodiaconia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 22:03, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eurodiaconia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG no in-depth independent sources Theroadislong (talk) 08:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 08:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Has plenty of references. Speaker616 (talk) 08:31, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:36, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:36, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There seem to be plenty of independent references.Rathfelder (talk) 12:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Google gives 47,100 results, Google Scholar about 380 articles for this term.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 00:35, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- It is not a good article but seems to be a Europe-wide network. I am not clear how notable it is. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.