Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euroasia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 04:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Euroasia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable private language training company. Very spamish and created by a SPA. I could not find info about the National Business Review statement about being an "exciting" company. That statement comes form the companies own press release. In fact, all three refs are primary sources. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. 05:57, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Delete: Promotion based on advertising materials. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to be a violation of WP:ADVERT. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:23, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.