Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro RSCG Worldwide PR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Euro RSCG Worldwide PR[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Euro RSCG Worldwide is unquestionably notable and has its own article. This page on "Euro RSCG Worldwide PR" is an individual division/subsidiary that may warrant inclusion in the main company's page, but is far from reaching the advice given at WP:LENGTH for creating a sub-article. The citations given are regarding the mother ship and Google searches only reveal brief mentions as one of the company's divisions. CorporateM (Talk) 16:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 16:35, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (warn) @ 20:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Per its parent company, it appears to be called Havas PR now. Website is here. It's president also has an article Marian Salzman. I found some regional coverage of Havas PR in Manchester Evening News here, and some industry focused coverage in trade mags and smaller online publications such as Mumbrella and CampaignBrief. JT_dale^Talk~ 10:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.