Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethnic conflict in India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. moink 19:10, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic conflict in India[edit]

After much careful thought and looks at the pages that this links to, I think this page should be deleted for these reasons: 1.It is a glorified list, the stuff it talks about is better explained on the pages it links to, which are themselves well-linked. 2.There are no articles like this for any other country. 3.The page is very incomplete and poorly done, and seems to have a little trouble deciding what an "ethnicity" is. It has been tagged for cleanup sine April 2005 and no-one's really done anything about it. Please consider getting rid of this page. Grandmasterka 07:47, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom for all of the specific reasons listed above, but particularly because of reason 1. --Alan Au 08:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 08:52, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Could be a useful article with LOTS of work by a knowledgeable person, but I can't see that happening and in the furrent form, delete Kcordina 11:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 14:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep India is a very populated country which has had many ethnic problems that are very important to it's history. This article provides links to the main articles of the conflict but can use a lot of help. It can be a very useful article.--a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:14, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ain't all countries are populated? Sorry, I should be chastised for this. --Ezeu 21:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Ezeu 13:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Avi 20:51, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep and cleanup --HasNoClue 22:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom.Blnguyen 00:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If we have to keep this eyesore, those who voted "keep" should be willing to do some work on it, it's in as sorry a shape now as it was four years ago. Grandmasterka 05:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment seems more like religious conflict than ethnic; I was expecting to see some references to the insurgent movements in the North East, some discussion of Kashmir, but lack of completeness is not a reason for deletion either. Carlossuarez46 18:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to that, I'm just saying that very little has been done to improve it since it was created all the way back in 2002, which tells me it's always going to be mediocre at best. But there are plenty of other reasons to delete it, as stated in the nomination. Grandmasterka 11:25, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.