Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethical anarchism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was doing as nominator suggested, further merges are at editorial discretion. Moreschi ^{If you've written a quality article...} 22:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ethical anarchism[edit]

I propose this page be deleted and replaced with a disambiguation page that links to Fred Woodworth/The Match and postmodern philosophy as I don't think either of the uses of this term qualify for their own article. The Woodworth/Match articles are rather small as is and would not be harmed by merging the two lines of info and picture here into them, while the postmodern phil section is already nothing but a disambiguation statement.

This article should be kept and expanded if non-trivial coverage of either of the uses exists in reliabel sources so that we can make a proper full-length article about it. Skomorokh ^incite 15:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been listed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Anarchism. Skomorokh ^incite 15:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Ethical anarchism and The Match with Fred Woodworth. Then create redirects to Fred Woodworth from Ethical anarchism and The Match. Finally, add to Fred Woodworth an inter-wiki link to postmodern philosophy. Argumentation: The articles The Match and Ethical anarchism contains an insufficient amount of material to validate seperate articles from Fred Woodworth. Lord Metroid (talk) 16:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge this per Lord Metroid. The concept doesn't appear to have any significant meaning apart from Woodworth's work. --Lockley (talk) 21:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Lord Metroid. The Match! is longer than hundreds of articles about other newspapers and magazines, including many mainstream publications, but it is largely duplicative of what is already at Fred Woodworth. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, ditto everything that's been said. Murderbike (talk) 23:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.