Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal Tears
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 01:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eternal Tears[edit]
- Eternal Tears (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Book series, pretty much summed up by this sentence of the second paragraph: "The first novel has yet to be published". Fails WP:BK AmaltheaTalk 16:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Wikipedia:BK#Not yet published books. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Too much speculation for my liking, and no references given for the information provided otherwise. A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 17:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and User:Metropolitan90 BanRay 17:16, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BK and Prodigy et. all--danielfolsom 18:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no references, and seems to be mostly speculation. Let's wait until it actually comes out. Green caterpillar (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per eloquently put nom and the author's own petard. JuJube (talk) 21:11, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 01:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Author removed my speed deletion tag. Delete per nominator. StaticGull Talk 11:37, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- To be fair, he was right to remove the A3 no content tag since he also introduced content with the same edit. AmaltheaTalk 12:12, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator looks to be a WP:CRYSTAL speculation at this point. RFerreira (talk) 19:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:58, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.