Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estudo do espaço cultural Grande Otelo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 17:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Estudo do espaço cultural Grande Otelo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not in English. When translated, it seems to be an essay. Tamravidhir (talk) 11:42, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not being in English is covered at WP:PNT. However, it isn't even an essay, it's an introduction to an essay, with a table of contents. It isn't a proper Wikipedia article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The first paragraph is a short promotional description of a cultural center in the city of Osasco. It is followed by a table of contents. It seems like part of a bigger research that was simply cut and pasted here as an article, but it lacks context, sources, indication of notability, all that basic stuff. I think it is important to point that one of the chapters of such study is entitled "protótipo: construção da pagina na wikipedia sobre o espaço cultural grande otelo", which could be translated as "Prototype: building of the Wikipedia page about the Espaço Cultural Grande Otelo". From the look of things, I'd say this is part of some kind of academic project involving Wikipedia, but probably targeted at the Portuguese one. (I'm a native speaker of Portuguese). Victão Lopes ^Fala! 03:01, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I've done a quick Google-aided translation. I took out the table, since it adds nothing, and did various other tidying. The article is, I feel, too short to stand on its own, and should be merged into the Osasco article.--Auric talk 12:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.