Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther Cañadas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that with searching in other languages/additional search terms there is sufficient sourcing to demonstrate notability (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 18:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Esther Cañadas[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It’s been a decade and no one has improved the article to properly establish notability. Trillfendi (talk) 16:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a trivial search finds significant coverage of subject across many years in multiple languages. WP:N clearly states that notability is not based on the state of sourcing in an article. Bakazaka (talk) 20:56, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe my googley just isn’t working then because I found no source for these statements in this article; everything says citation needed for a reason.Trillfendi (talk) 21:00, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For example, searching "esther cañadas sete gibernau" in Google gets an El Pais article [1] as the very first hit. If that's not working, then it's going to be difficult to do a proper WP:BEFORE. Bakazaka (talk) 21:06, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's very easy to find sources, especially in Spanish but also in English. Instead of just googling a name, it's often helpful to do a more specific search by adding a word that relates to the person, like esther canadas modelo to find Spanish articles about a Spanish model or esther canadas "people.com" because People magazine might've written about a popular model [2]. -kyykaarme (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:32, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Based on sources found by other editors. I note that the Spanish Wikipedia version of this article has a source in El Pais for her place of birth, and there may be other useful references in the other language Wikipedias too. RebeccaGreen (talk) 06:04, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.