Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esperanza Miyake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza Miyake[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She undoubtedly exists; she certainly wrote (co-wrote, actually) the book mentioned; and she gets a few hits on Scholar. Does this cross the bar for notability? I'd suggest it doesn't. Black Kite 14:27, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Little impact yet. Article was created too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Early-career scholar with little impact yet, e.g. books written = 0, books co-edited = 1, h-index = 0 (WoS) and 2 (GS), no other notable academic achievement, title, accomplishment, etc. that shows up on Google – way short of anything in WP:PROF. Article history indicates this is a student-created fan page. Uncontroversial delete. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.