Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. and nomination withdrawn. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is pretty much spam. The article has also been nominated for deletion in the Portuguese Wikipedia. --Bageense^(disc.) 18:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. --Bageense^(disc.) 18:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and Brazil. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seventy-year-old degree-awarding institution. No good reason given for deletion; the quality of the article is irrelevant to the notability of the subject and what other wikis do is irrelevant to us. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
and what other wikis do is irrelevant to us. I already knew that, but I'm glad to see it blatantly stated. --Bageense^(disc.) 04:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found some academic journals detailing the history and importance of the organization via the Wikipedia Library ([1]), so it seems to satisfy WP:NCORP. The article definitely needs some cleanup, as most of it is unsourced and spammy. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 15:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: as the proponent, I intend to recreate this article in my Wikipedia, this time without spam. Then I might translate it to English, in order to fix the problem here too. Thanks for those who've helped... maybe it wasn't a good idea to open this proposal. @Explicit: I don't know if you can close this proposal sooner. --Bageense^(disc.) 08:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.