Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esção

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Esção[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a new computer arcitecture, which has close to no content and no evidence of notability or discussion on third-party sources. - Altenmann >t 20:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 22:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Absolutely no coverage in reliable sources, all I find is their sourceforge page and mirrorings of our article. --Cybercobra (talk) 22:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a secondary source, and there is no reliable independent tertiary coverage. May become notable in the future, but is not now. Haakon (talk) 22:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have been unable to find any reliable, third-party sources for the subject, which leads me to believe that it does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. As such, I do not feel that it merits inclusion. All I am finding is Wikipedia-related hits, surname hits, SourceForge, etc. Cocytus [»talk«] 18:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.