Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erskine Oglesby

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erskine Oglesby[edit]

Erskine Oglesby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG the main source is self-published through Lulu.com, so not reliable. The other sources in the article are passing mentions or don't mention Oglesby at all. On a before search, I found a one paragraph obit and Newspapers.com has a local ad for his performing, and seemingly nothing else besides passing mentions. this suggests there may be more, but the only one of those sources I found is not SIGCOV, as mentioned above. Notability is not conferred just by having played with some famous people, there needs to be coverage to back it up, coverage that I just don't see. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. I searched Google, ProQuest and JSTOR but couldn't find acceptable sources. Subject does not meet our notability standards. Z1720 (talk) 23:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. I don't have access to the full article online, but I found a reference to an obituary published in Living Blues: Brett, Bonner (September 2004). "Erskine Oglesby". Living Blues. 35 (5): 95. ISSN 0024-5232. That, combined with [1] this from WOMEX, and some local coverage in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, might be enough for GNG. But without access to a copy of that issue of the magazine, I can't say for sure how in-depth the coverage is. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.