Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errol Flynn Filmhouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Royal & Derngate. MBisanz ^talk 03:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Errol Flynn Filmhouse[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply not notable. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ as the three references added by User: Isaidnoway constitute significant coverage in reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Qwfp (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's a small, three-year-old cinema. What on earth is notable about it? -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changing !vote to Merge to Royal & Derngate, the theatre complex to which it's attached (having read article and sources slightly more thoroughly). Some coverage in recently added refs, but as it's only short there's no obvious need for a separate article. Qwfp (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Royal & Derngate per Qwfp. There's nothing wrong with the article's present text that precludes merging, but this venue doesn't seem to really be independently notable of the main theatre. Blythwood (talk) 20:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Royal & Derngate. Insufficiently notable on its own. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:03, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Royal & Derngate, which is a functional outcome that will improve the merge target article, which presently only mentions the filmhouse in passing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.