Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Sampson Parsons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 00:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ernest Sampson Parsons[edit]
It's all in some weird language (probably French). Someone had a go at translating it, but I think we should save them the trouble an send it to hell instead. This guy's not notable, and we all know it Dangherous 17:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - 6 non-wiki ghits, all on free web hosts. Unverifiable and unreferenced. MER-C 13:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per MER-C. Nominators should restrict their comments to reasons why the article is up for AfD, and not make comments that could be taken as narrow-minded ("some weird language", for instance - it's not weird just because the nominator doesn't understand or recognize it). See the comments about Canada above as well. --Charlene 16:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lacks multiple independent attestations of notability. Wikipedia is not a site for genealogical postings. It sounds like the gent might be notable, based on the account, but couldn't find evidence of it. Edison 19:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete
Needs citations and major clean up. Until then,it's not up to snuff. Caknuck 21:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Comment From what I can gather, this is about a 19th century historical(?) figure. Google hits are not availing for people who died a hundred years ago. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I put some time into translating the Spanish to piece together the paragraphs already in English. All of the article is about the subject's grandfather, the Earl of Rosse. The only bits of the article that pertain directly to the subject is the geneaology. If the subject is a legitimate descendant of Irish nobility, there should be some sources available for citation, online or not. Caknuck 20:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment From what I can gather, this is about a 19th century historical(?) figure. Google hits are not availing for people who died a hundred years ago. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. RFerreira 06:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.