Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erjon Xhafa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erjon Xhafa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a footballer who fails both WP:GNG, and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, player plays in Albanian Superliga --Vinie007 19:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)--Vinie007 19:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a source that states that the Albanian Superliga is fully pro? Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - until there is evidence these two have played professionally Spiderone 13:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note - the Jakupi nomination was added after the two comments above. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Delete this also Spiderone 14:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all three - they have not played in a fully-professional league, failing WP:NFOOTBALL; they have also not been the subject of significant coverage, failing WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 01:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.