Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin McGathy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:44, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erin McGathy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with the basis of adding sources but none of those are actually convincing as they are an interview and a local news story, there's still not enough confirming the needed independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 16:42, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I found this: [1]. I'm not yet convinced of notability but we'll see what others can come up with. --Michig (talk) 07:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: While notability is not inherited, she has got a pretty decent list of credits. The article needs more sourcing. But I am not the person with the time to do so, thus for now I am simply !voting based on current content and a cursory google search. Montanabw ^(talk) 22:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Sources here although many are just mentions in connection to her union/disunion with Dan Harmon, plus sources here identify her as a podcaster and comedian. Not much in-depth but there is ink.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There is still noticeably not a lot, as suggested here, to actually suggest emphasizing her own actual substance for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: I believe there's enough coverage to qualify her for inclusion, which has been pointed out by others in this conversation. She does share press with Dan Harmon often, and while "being the wife of a notable figure" doesn't qualify, it's worth noting that she was an active participant on these shows, with writing or acting credits. We should be careful not to overreach against those contributions simply because she created / developed them alongside her husband. --Owlsmcgee (talk) 22:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sufficient coverage as noted by others to support WP:GNG. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 20:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.