Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin Elizabeth Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erin Elizabeth Williams[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Williams lone claim to fame is being Miss Delaware, and this is not enough on its own to justify having an article on her. By most interpretations we lack any sources that fit the criteria for meeting GNG, that is reliable, 3rd party, secondary sources. The one source is from the Miss Delaware organization, which has interest in mentioning and promoting its title winners. Even if we were to accept that it is indepedent and reliable enough to count, GNG requires multiple sources, and we would have a one event problem. My search for additional sources. I did find this [1] article from the Syracuse University newspaper. An article that begins "Syracuse is know for among other things its beautiful women" does not highly reccomend itself as reliable. Generally we do not consider articles in college newspapers to be enough to demonstrate their subjects are notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:23, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 15:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as considering all of the past mountains of AfDs closed as Delete, this is no different given there's only 1 trivial pageant - and that's it. SwisterTwister talk 07:28, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- only one source listed and it's a primary one. Per prior outcomes, such pages are routinely deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.