Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Erika Smith

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Erika Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence doesn’t satisfy GNG. She also doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR as she merely appears in cameos. Celestina007 (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - Of the sources in the article, 3 are not independent, and 1 is a news item unrelated to her being an actress or celebrity impersonator. This leaves just one viable source for notability and that item from dreadcrentral is insubstantial. I can find no better coverage in my own searches. -- Whpq (talk) 19:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
• Delete clearly not enough sources that are relible, 3rd party indepth sources to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.