Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Karapetyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. So Why 07:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Karapetyan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded without rationale. Only improvement was the addition of a single, non-independent source, currently still the only sourcing for this blp. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage, so they fail WP:GNG, and nothing in the article suggests that they even approach passing WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Keep as a well-known Armenian singer. The article passes WP:MUSICBIO, as the singer won several competitions and has been a featured subject of a TV network. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfsDXD-0B_M this is one of his huge LIVE concerts. Harut (talk) 12:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC) Please note that editor is the article's creator.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Expand - truly deserving artist, I watched the video, what an incredible talent, wow. But the article requires expansion and more sources. Google search shows a good number of them. Eric was also one of the 5 Armenian jury members at the [Eurovision 2016 contest], which is also a good qualifying factor to pass WP:MUSICBIO. Fiddler11 03:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - would either of the above editors care to share any of the sources they've found to show notability? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:11, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To address Onel5969's question
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.