Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Christensen (snowboarder)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 22:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Christensen (snowboarder)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I simply found nothing to suggest better improvement with these links being my best search results and this article has existed since December 2008 and started by a "Etren" (somewhat suspect this is the subject himself). Notifying past taggers Zanimum and Dawn Bard. NOTE: I'm also nominating another sports bio Phil Shao who although seemed to have gotten a fair amount of coverage locally especially for the memorial park (see my best results here, here, here and here), I'm not sure if there's enough for a separate article and at best should be briefly mentioned at the Redwood City, California article. This article has existed since May 2006 and has hardly changed since then. Notifying author Nocarsgo and past editor Jason Quinn. SwisterTwister talk 18:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in 2008 I tagged it with the {{notability}} tag, so yeah, even then I agreed with deletion. Amazed that it lasted so long. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My edits in this only involved two cleanup edits to the Phil Shao article. I have no idea why I was singled out from among the other editors to that page. I have no personal interest in either article. I'm not sure these two deletions should be bundled however. Jason Quinn (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 17:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sources other than youtube--failing GNG.--JumpLike23 (talk) 06:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 16:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and other comment. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:27, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.