Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Obuh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 09:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Obuh[edit]

Eric Obuh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Article does not meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines , please the references here are mostly talking about Welcome to Lagos: how Nigeria's dirt poor scratch a living in a city teeming with business flair .... there is NO Evidence of Notability about the Musician himself on those few Relieble Article here... --Samat lib (talk) 09:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I fixed the nom. ansh666 09:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The claim of being featured in a BBC documentary looks significant at first glance, but after looking into it he's one of several who appeared in a multi-part TV series. The article is also extremely promotional, with several paragraphs reading like some sort of personal sales brochure, with sentences like, "His touching story is enough to bring back the dead dreams of an average student." and worse. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that an article is poorly written is usually not a valid reason for deletion, especially if the subject of the article is notable like this one. In addition, the maintenance tags such as {{multiple issues}} exist for reasons and could probably be used in any of these cases. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 09:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Note to closing Admin: User:Samat lib and User: Kokobenin are currently under investigation for possible Sockpuppetry as User: Kokobenin account was specifically created for disruptive purpose probably by User:Samat lib to always support their hilarious nominations at AfDs. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Samat lib. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 21:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I've struck out vote from sockpuppet of nom. -- haminoon (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: Shall we consider stubifying? Shii (tock) 07:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shii (tock) 07:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.