Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Kline
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 02:07, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Eric Kline[edit]
- Eric Kline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability for this person. Tagged as advertisement, autobiography, conflict of interest, and notability, for over 5 years without improvement. All these issues remain.
Suspect sock puppets also. Original article creation was mostly by two users who have only edited this article and done nothing since. Anon support for the article on talk page is also by two IP accounts who have only ever edited this article.
Large amount of name dropping, but nothing in the article shows notabilty for the person rather than the companies he may be associated with. Dmol (talk) 22:00, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I find nothing about his radio show beyond the launch announcements. Hosting a seminar doesn't make one notable. His book (CD, whatever) was self-published and didn't seem to stir up much activity. No awards, no controversies, nothing anyone seemed to care enough to write about. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 04:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per OP and Uncle Milty. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 07:08, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - bordering on spam. Bearian (talk) 18:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.