Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Don

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Don[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No relevant sources, and fails notability criteria for actors as far as I can see. [[CharlieEchoTango]] 00:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sign of notability per WP:GNG WP:BIO, lacks significant coverage in reliable sources WP:VRS; per WP:BLP not notable Chzz ► 00:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not fulfill Actors' Notability or Creative professionals' Notability. IMDb, teen idols 4 you, and connect.in.com are not reliable sources, external links section is mostly a repeat of links to those three websites. Shearonink (talk) 04:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Apparently Paintballspy (talk · contribs) (WP:SPA) has no interest in this discussion and prefers to remove the notice from the page, and he has done so twice now (since 76.172.95.131 (talk · contribs) appears to be the same user, before he logs in (see page history)). [[CharlieEchoTango]] 22:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--Musamies (talk) 06:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Lack of verifiability or coverage in relioable sources fails WP:GNG. Acting career[1] fails WP:ENT. His being in commercials belongs only in a resume... unless his being in those commercials received coverage... and it has not. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.