Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric B. Hughes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eric B. Hughes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filmmaker of questionable notability. Google news search on "Eric B. Hughes" shows zero results. Standard search on the same shows a lot of social media and passing mentions in directories and the like, but no significant coverage from independent reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:50, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He's an award winning film director with 3 projects in the can. Why delete? Google E.B. Hughes, there are links suitable for Wikipedia. No reason to delete.Bellatarr (talk) 19:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. MikeWazowski did Google the subject and found nothing suitable. If he'd turned up reliable sources, this discussion likely wouldn't have been started. —C.Fred (talk) 20:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 00:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 13:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice to re-creation later. This filmmaker does not appear to have achieved notability yet. If any of his upcoming films manage to get some kind of regular distribution, or he otherwise receives more media attention, the article can be re-created at that time. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable independent third party sources. If the article is improve to include such sources, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:43, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.