Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erasma Arellano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 16:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erasma Arellano[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced BLP that fails GNG and BIO as long as my BLPPROD stands after it removed by some editor who appeared to be sourced. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 06:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 06:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 06:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - The subject was a bronze medalist in the Asian games in 1958. and per WP:NTRACK, he qualifies for an article per criterion #3, "Finished top 3 in any other major senior level international competition (this includes prestigious small field meets, e.g. IAAF Diamond League/IAAF Golden League meets, less prestigious large scale meets, e.g. Asian Games, and any IAAF Gold Label Road Race that is not explicitly mentioned above)". The argument to delete is grounded in the claim that it is "unsourced", while half of this two-sentence stub is the listing of the source, which has been there from the very moment this article was posted. They are sourcing it to the piece on the subject in the book Filipino World Champions, published by National Book Store in 2005. If you doubt the existence of this book, you can find a record of it here. Here is its Worldcat record. --Nat Gertler (talk) 07:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I have now expanded the article, so that it specifically mentions the medal, and has a web-based source that can easily be used to verify the claim. I suggest that the nominator consider revoking his nomination. --Nat Gertler (talk) 08:15, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.