Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equator Pure Nature

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Equator Pure Nature[edit]

Equator Pure Nature (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing here to demonstrate notability. What appear to be reliable sources are interviews or press releases. The whole tone is very advertorial . Draft was moved to mainspace without any reviews. Fails WP:GNG. Very strong likelihood of COI or paid editing  Velella  Velella Talk   13:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  Velella  Velella Talk   13:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Does have some coverage[1][2][3] and mentions by some Japanese publications [4][5][6], though a bit less than I was expecting, since their main product "Pipper Standard" is a fairly familiar name. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. I haven't managed to find any references that meets the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails NCORP. HighKing++ 19:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per HighKing. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 07:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.