Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epona's Song
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP: merge and redirect. Paul August ☎ 00:38, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Epona's Song[edit]
Article is unencyclopedic as well as poorly written, refers to a small part of a couple of video games, and content is redundant because of listing in the Legend of Zelda series songs page. I had originally changed this page into a redirect upon creation of that one, but the sole author reverted it and put a link to it in the other page. WikidSmaht (talk) 06:56, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. NN. Steve Casburn 07:19, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep recurring song. Kappa 07:25, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything that's not redundant, then redirect. If the author doesn't like it, revert him once, then if he keeps warring over it, head for the talk page and deploy the Ultimate Weapon: reason. (Och, it sounds so easy, doesn't it? "Just use reason!") --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect per mark Anetode 10:05, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. Disputed merges aren't an AFD thing; just talk about it on the talk pages in question. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 11:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There's not much to dispute. Just explain our practices to the author, and consider this as a consensus to merge. Sonic Mew | talk to me 12:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.