Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Episode CMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:13, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Episode CMS[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can not find any signs of notability whatsoever. Haakon (talk) 19:55, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
Delete First ever version 0.0.1 was released yesterday, doesn't appear on Google, clear case of spam. Greenman (talk) 22:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Google query for "EpisodeCMS" has 3520 results
This CMS is very young but it is opensource and have big potential. This maybe the best CMS on CakePHP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RazbakovAleksey (talk • contribs) 22:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:N - the software may have potential, but until it receives significant independent coverage it is not notable. Wikipedia is not used for promotion of new software, rather for recording of already established software. Greenman (talk) 11:45, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note, the article was copied to EpisodeCMS (without the space) today, and the original article was made into a redirect. So a "manual move", losing the history. Outcome of this AfD should apply to both pages. Haakon (talk) 17:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wait please for a month to approve that it is important stuff. I think developers can say that i'm right. Project is too young, it's true, but it has good potential. RazbakovAleksey (talk) 03:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, no reliable sources. --Nuujinn (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.