Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environment //+ (programming language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Environment //+ (programming language)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is probably a hoax, and is probably made up. The idea that the company wants to remain anonymous sounds like nonsense. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Given the purported name and the the purported anonymity, this is unsourceable. Υπογράφω (talk) 04:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it reads like an advertisement which fails WP:NOTADVERTISING. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions}) 04:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Forget notability (which it apparently doesn't have, per my review), why hasn't this been speedied? Lourdes 05:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - What speedy category? Software doesn't fit any of the A7 categories, because it isn't a company, person, or web content. It isn't advertising if it doesn't describe the product well enough to try to sell it. Probably hoax, but the speedy criterion is clear hoaxes. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I was thinking of a hoax speedy. Will go by your judgement. Lourdes 19:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete May or may not be a hoax. Some secret company may or may not be working on a new programming language. The fact is, there are no reliable sources to reference an article, even a stub. The article can be recreated if/when the project comes to fruition and if/when the product becomes notable. Neiltonks (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It indicates that the article is about a product under development which has no notability whatsoever, article is promotional and unverifiable. Fbergo (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.