Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique Mora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 18:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enrique Mora[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no RS for this person, just wiki mirrors, there are other people with the same name,such as a felon in Miami and a Columbian general, but cannot find anything on this Spanish diplomat. Appears not to satisfy WP:BIO –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There is some mention of him in sources such as this and this which would verify him. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 21:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the first source [[1] is a self published book by a blogger, {http://www.la-monfortcloa.es/}, and the second merely mentions a judge in Aragon called Jose Enrique Mora Mateo a different person, [[2]. I don't think that these really confer any notability. The European Union website has nothing. El Mundo and El Pais have nothing. Neither does the Spanish Foreign Ministry [3]. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first source is published by John Wiley & Sons - far from self-published. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it has two excellent sources; he looks like a notable diplomat. Bearian (talk) 22:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - certainly WP:V (as per Bearian), but with the amount of coverage thin I'm not optimisic this will grow beyond the barest stub. Hope someone proves me wrong. :) --j⚛e decker ^talk 20:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Coverage is verifiable but very minimal. I feel that subjects should have more than passing mentions. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shimeru 00:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, insufficient amount of specific and detailed coverage for passing WP:BIO. Nsk92 (talk) 12:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.