Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eniaptycha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. StarM 04:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eniaptycha[edit]

Contested PROD. Art concept related to one individual artist, and that gets two google hits, one of which being this article. The Greek text for the concept and the artist (Ενιάπτυχα, Ρέας Μπέιλυ) gets a single google hit, Wikipedia. There is an article for a Rhea Bailey, but it's a totally different person. Please Delete. role^player 11:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this terrible mess is not a Wiki article. More seriously, no reliable source to establish notability.--Boffob (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note. Eniaptycha (polytech) is a term coined by Leading Cypriot and International Artist Rhea Bailey to describe her new works divided into 9 panels. This is the first time that an artist make a contribution to the form of art work. this way it is importnat to keep this article left at User talk:Megrafik 12:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC) -- role^player 13:19, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note - the preceding comment, by the nominator, was changed from "note" to "Keep" by the IP 2 comments down.[1] I have changed back. Johnbod (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Let's see, WP:NOTDICDEF, WP:NOTSOAPBOX, etc. I could come up with more. DARTH PANDA ^duel 14:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It looks great to me. I believe several people would be interested in that. and this a real contribution to the form of art work. it could be improved by adding links and images about the process and the art work.--217.29.240.34 (talk) 07:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~. I agree that external links about the artist work and images of the eniaptycha could be included later. I am sure that this term is now in use in the art circles.--Megrafik (talk) 07:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same person of the keep vote posted by user Roleplayer above. Dekisugi (talk) 07:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~. considering web tracks about this article here is a material published in the Leading Cypriot Newspaper philenews: http://www.philenews.com/main/main.asp?gid=506&id=589325&issuenum=17626--Megrafik (talk) 07:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to vote more than once, please. Dekisugi (talk) 07:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - of course. No references given. It falls to WP:NEO. Dekisugi (talk) 07:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom & deleters. NN Johnbod (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above..the Greek should be deleted, the resume eliminated, and references, and sources added and maybe then...the article can read, not now..Modernist (talk) 05:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.