Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English Jamaicans (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English Jamaicans[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Renominating this per @Liz's advice.

This should be deleted OR redirected to British Jamaicans. What little info is on here is likely already in that article. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, England, and Jamaica. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 09:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or possibly redirect. No good reason for this fork. JMWt (talk) 10:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to British Jamaicans – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too short and not enough reliable sources.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Complex/_Rational 17:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete The redirect is a problem because, as it stands, the two phrases mean reversed things: one is about people in the UK, and the other is about people in Jamaica. They aren't claimed to be synonyms, so we shouldn't make a redirect that says they are. And this article really says nothing about people of English descent in Jamaica, so it needs to go. Mangoe (talk) 20:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to British Jamaicans would be the best option. TH1980 (talk) 02:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Mangoe is correct in stating that the term as currently used on Wikipedia isn't a subset of British Jamaicans. Going by a cursory search, it doesn't appear to be commonly used in that sense either, so it doesn't make sense to redirect there. ― novov (t c) 07:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing useful here. Will only cause confusion if redirected to British Jamaicans because, what about Jamaican Americans? They are also "English" I must say. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.