Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering, procurement and construction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Engineering, procurement and construction[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vague topic, WP:NOTHOWTO John from Idegon (talk) 08:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least TNT Concept appears to have some use, but this form is wholly not encyclopedic, mainly failing WP:NOTHOWTO or that it is copied from some rule book somewhere. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 02:20, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Better articles already exist at project management and design-build. shoy (reactions) 14:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, beyond the problems pointed out above there are also copyright issues. For example, parts are copied, or at least very closely paraphrased, from here. Huon (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.