Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 17:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Engim[edit]

per WP:SPAM. Vanity article created by Alex Bugeja about his defunct corporation. Related article on Bugeja has been tagged with sppedy per A7 and G12. Scores 31 unique Ghits. Ohconfucius 02:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm not sure it really qualifies as spam, but it's a defunct corporation and the article itself says "although not commercially successful", they developed a somewhat advanced technology. Unfortunately, in the broad scheme of things, their invention was an incremental improvement over existing technology, and that, combined with a lack of commercial success, spells "non-notable". Fails WP:CORP and has WP:COI issues; it must go. --Xtifr _tälk 21:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.