Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endor AG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Endor AG[edit]

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sourcing all WP:FANCRUFT and a before search did not yield any WP:SIGCOV. Fails NCORP ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator as speedy keep ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, Technology, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep under the argument that Fanatec passes WP:NPRODUCT, and "In cases where a company is mainly known for a single series of products or services, it is usually better to cover the company and its products/services in the same article". Coverage of Fanatec products over a decade: [1] [2] [3] [4] ~ A412 ^talk! 23:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A412 this argument makes a lot of sense. While the tone of reviews are more promotional than I'd like, there are multiple of them and they are extensive. Your argument makes a lot of sense and I learned something new. Am withdrawing my AfD, thank you! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.