Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 05:17, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Encef[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only mention of Encef is on the disambiguation page. Leschnei (talk) 00:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems to be a valid disambiguation page. Also used as a trade name for Cefixime [1] [2]. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep after adding these trade names, sourced, to the respective articles - both seem to include several unsourced tradenames in infobox, not sure what the best way would be to add this content with a source. Then strip the refs out of the dab page. PamD 15:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: perfectly valid dab page disambiguating between two articles, with more to be added. – Uanfala (talk) 23:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.