Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enabled.in

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Enabled.in[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page was created by the same person who created the website (WP:COI). I also don't believe the coverage this has received is enough to pass WP:NCORP or WP:WEB. Sgubaldo (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability, Websites, and India. Sgubaldo (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is nowhere near enough to meet WP:NCORP. There does not seem to be enough references to establish notability and it is written like an advertisement. The prose is also very poor. Article was created by the person who created the site. FlutterDash344 (talk) 21:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Subject not notable, and the very short article is basically an advert. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.