Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emysphilia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-31 06:39Z

Emysphilia[edit]

Unlikely-sounding fetish. No result for either of the published sources on Google, nor in the British Library or the Library of Congress catalogs. No results for the author "Daniel Schechner" either outside of Wikipedia mirrors and forums. If anyone can turn up sources or verify the existing ones, I'll withdraw the AfD. Demiurge 18:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating Daniel Schechner under this AfD, for the same reasons. I found the Cody paper cited as a source in this article, but it doesn't mention Schechner at all, nor "emysphilia". Demiurge 18:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - very likely fake, since even Google hasn't heard of it. Also delete Daniel Schechner (non-notable, fails WP:BIO). Jayden54 20:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, no sources. Shimeru 21:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete cowabunga dude. Danny Lilithborne 21:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.