Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emrie Brooke Foster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 21:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Emrie Brooke Foster[edit]
- Emrie Brooke Foster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Few if any reliable sources supporting notability. JNW (talk) 19:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find any. Drmies (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't appear to meet WP:ARTIST and no decent citations either on the article or in google.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all. Johnbod (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of reliable sources and notability, WP:ARTIST. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 13:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.