Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emperor Jewels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as spam. -→Buchanan-Hermit ™/?! 04:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emperor Jewels[edit]

Strong Delete: Advertisement Paul Cyr 01:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Arbusto 01:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. PJM 01:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, unless it can be edited into something that is not a blatent ad. --Supermath 02:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spamvertising for NN [1] company. -- IslaySolomon 02:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete SPAM. Stubbleboy 03:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Burnificate with Chilli as fool's gold-plated blatant advertising. Article could be restated as "Buy my stuffs 'weblink'". Page still under construction, Alexa rank of 3,524,530 and just looking at the site makes my credit card twitch. Enough said. QuagmireDog 03:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wait, this is the definition of spamcruftvert (shudder). -- MarcoTolo 04:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. The "contact us" kind of clinched it. JIP | Talk 07:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Emperor Has Deleted Clothes - VSCA. Need I say more? Torinir _{( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options )} 17:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't believe there is anything wrong with this article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Emperorjewels (talk • contribs) .

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.