Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotronic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emotronic[edit]

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. Deletion reason was -- nn neologism, this is just plain odd, but needs more research and eyes. This is not a valid speedy deletion reason, therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 02:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a neologism. --Dennisthe2 02:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless there are any notable artists in the genre. riana_dzasta 03:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Taking the first half of the name of Genre A, adding the second half of the name of Genre B and declaring a new Genre halfway between the two is a time honored, but totally pointless, tradition. Term is not more than the sum of its parts. - Richfife 05:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nn neologism, 554 non-wiki ghits outside of myspace. MER-C 12:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MER-C. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 12:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mer-C. Sharkface217 05:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mer-C. NeoJustin 22:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense. Danny Lilithborne 22:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.