Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotistyle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Per OR, V, & SNOW. SkierRMH (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emotistyle[edit]

Returns absolutely 0 relevant google hits, only page that appears to be about it is a forum post by the author on the website it is talking about, which itself returns only 4,350 google hits and has no article. It appears to be a forum with 220 posts and 66 members. Clearly non-notable. Atropos 00:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is obviously original research. will381796 00:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I've removed the link, as it is from a forum, and not a reliable source for any of this Original Research. - Rjd0060 00:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable, non notable, incomprehensible - take your pick. Maralia 05:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NFT, with subtle notes of patent nonsense. hateless 12:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Hammer1980·^talk 17:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no references, possibly original research, unverifiable. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 05:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per everyone.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 06:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.