Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmyblaq
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Given that no source analysis is presented, I'm going to default to those arguing to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Emmyblaq[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Emmyblaq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another GNG article whose sources are mostly paid promotional pieces. Does not meet WP:IS. Nswix (talk) 00:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. Nswix (talk) 00:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- DeletePer nominator.DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 01:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 04:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Extensively sourced to multiple major Nigerian papers of record, with absolutely no evidence presented that the sources are paid journalism. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 05:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I see no problem with the sources present. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It’s a standard article
Amaekuma (talk) 14:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.