Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Straschnov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 05:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Straschnov[edit]

Emmanuel Straschnov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not independently notable - mentioned only in relation to Bubble (programming language) and the available coverage doesn't provide a sufficient basis for a biographical article. Rentier (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough coverage. No book coverage. Only 26 Google news hits - and they do not look like in-depth coverage of Straschnov (I admit I ignored hits in Chinese).Icewhiz (talk) 10:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Just added some sources to make the article stronger (i'm pretty new to this so learning) Manu239 (talk) 02:01pm, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Manu239 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 03:24, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- not independently notable from the company; significant RS coverage not found. The article is mostly promotional, as in:
  • "Emmanuel often speaks publicly about Bubble!" Etc.
Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, so delete. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, it is not meant to be a comprehensive listing of business people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.