Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emirates American Football League

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 06:17, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emirates American Football League[edit]

Emirates American Football League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed. "non-professional league for amateurs" says it all. Fails inclusion standards amd just promotional by a SPA. Legacypac (talk) 20:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I thought this was a clear delete myself going in, but I switched my position when I clicked on the "News" link in the template above, and found oodles of articles. I'll admit I don't recognize the sources there since I don't live in that part of the world... but I'm willing to assume good faith in those sources. Because of the volume of coverage the league gets, I'm looking at a clear pass of WP:GNG and then realize the article needs to be edited and sources added instead of removed from the encyclopedia.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Lots of articles, which could probably have been seen with WP:BEFORE, not sure on reliability but will assume good faith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DTM9025 (talkcontribs) 02:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.